A complete guide for parents & teachers of preschool and kindergarten children
When a young child asks “Will you write this for me?”, most adults simply write the words. Literacy expert Matt Glover explains why he generally does not write for children, what he does instead, and how to support the natural developmental stages of early writing — which he calls word making.
The talk runs in two parts. Part 1 sets out the stages of word-making development and the five problems with writing for a child. Part 2 gives the practical answer: what to say, what to model, and how to move a child forward one small step at a time.
This page is a detailed, section-by-section synthesis of both videos, with timestamps so you can jump to the source. It is not a verbatim transcript.
Video: Part 1: Supporting Word Making for Young Writers
≈ 10 min · Parent to Parent · 14 April 2020
Children in preschool and kindergarten often bring a page to an adult and ask: “Would you write this for me?” Parents and teachers usually comply. Matt Glover’s answer is different: when he works in schools, he does not write for children. Part 1 explains why; Part 2 explains what to do instead.
A common assumption is that there is nothing a child can do until they know letter–sound relationships. That assumption is the root of the problem. Development does not begin with letters and sounds, and it does not begin with spelling.
Before conventional writing, children move through a series of approximations. Each stage is real writing, not a failed attempt at adult writing. Matt illustrates each one with pages from children’s books.
From beginning phonetic spelling, children move through beginning and ending consonants, medial consonants and short vowels, long-vowel patterns, and eventually conventional spelling. The important point is direction of travel: conventional spelling is far down the road. It is not the starting line, and word making does not begin with spelling.
Once we accept that children have alternatives, there is a decision: the child writes it the best they can, or the adult writes it for them.
Matt shows a page from Allie’s book. The sentence “Arthur’s friends go camping” was written by an adult on a separate sheet, and Allie copied it. Copying looks more independent than it is. Allie is not deciding which letters she needs; she is reproducing someone else’s decisions. In terms of thinking, copying is no different from having an adult write it for her.
The words an adult writes are usually outside the child’s reading vocabulary. Even a common word like go may not be recognised. When Allie reads her book, she does not read the words at all; she looks at the pictures and remembers what to say. The adult’s print is not helping her read.
To decide what to teach next, you must first see what the child can do entirely alone. If an adult writes the sentence, you no longer know whether the child would have used scribble, random letters, or one sound per word. Without that baseline, you cannot find the next small step.
Learning happens just beyond what a child can already do independently — what Matt calls the next small step. Writing for the child removes the evidence you need to locate it.
If Allie would have written that sentence with random strings of letters, then handing her the conventional spelling of friends jumps her across many stages at once. Matt describes it as twelve or fourteen stages down the road. That is not a gentle nudge; it is a huge push past everything in between.
No one writes for a child to be unkind, but the message that arrives is: I am not comfortable with your approximations. Your writing is not good enough the way you do it. A child writing the best they can is already doing the best they can. Adults should be comfortable with that — while still teaching, and still helping the child improve.
The goal is not to expect perfection from the start. It is for children to put both pictures and words into their books. If they never put words in, they never discover that they can.
If a child says “Would you draw a dog for me?”, drawing the dog does not help them draw anything else. Instead we teach strategies: think about the shapes you need, the parts — a tail, legs — the colours. Writing works the same way. If we would not draw for a child, why would we write for one?
There are situations where writing for a child makes sense — for example, a child writing a letter who wants a particular person’s name, especially at home. That is a little different. But by and large, Matt does not write for children, for all the reasons above.
Writing for a child does not help them as a reader, does not show what they can do, hides the next step, skips developmental stages, and sends a message we do not want to send. Instead, teach strategies the child can use independently.
Video: Part 2: Supporting Word Making for Young Children
≈ 8–9 min · Parent to Parent · 15 April 2020
This phrase works on two fronts at once. It addresses disposition — it is acceptable not to spell everything perfectly — and skill — there are concrete ways to get words onto the page. Both are needed; reassurance without strategy leaves the child stuck.
When Matt asks young children whether they should be able to spell every word perfectly, the most common answer is yes. Adults have to communicate the opposite: writing it the best you can is the right thing to do at this age. What else could a four-year-old do? But being comfortable with approximations is not enough on its own — the child also needs to know how to approximate.
In preschool and kindergarten classes, Matt teaches children the different ways they can get words into their books. He does not pretend to be unable to write; he frames the demonstration honestly: “Let me show you what four-year-olds do. Let me show you what preschoolers do.” The modelling is explicit, brief, and repeated early in the year, before children begin making books independently.
Matt uses his own book about Milo the dog chasing a squirrel. The squirrel is in a tree, so the word he wants is tree. Instead of spelling it correctly, he walks through the options a young child could use.
Make continuous marks where the word goes. “You can make marks for your words — that’s fine. That is far better than having no words at all.”
Write letters the child knows, letters from their name, or letters chosen from an alphabet chart. X and O, or Z and M, are acceptable. Does it really spell tree? No — and that is okay at four. Random letters are still valuable because the child practises forming letters.
Stretch the word: t-r-ee. The child may hear the opening t, or the final e sound. One sound, or several, is fine. Matt then points out what the child’s attempt does not yet capture: tree also has an r that is hard to hear, and another e that is almost silent.
Pretending is not a consolation prize; it is how young children enter almost everything. They pretend to be firefighters and princesses. Pretending to write is a legitimate starting point — and many children relax when they hear it is allowed.
Matt repeats the demonstration with leash: scribble it, write random letters such as A, M and T, or say it slowly and record the opening l. The repetition matters. Children need to see that the strategies are general, not a trick for one word.
After each attempt Matt makes the gap visible — “Does that really spell tree? No” — and immediately makes it acceptable: “And is that okay if you’re four?” The child learns both the truth about spelling and the truth about development.
Then comes the nudge. Children may stay at one stage for a while; that is normal. The adult’s job is to keep noticing what the child can do now and offer the next small step, rather than jumping to the final destination.
Watch for children who only write words they can find. Matt has seen books filled with mum, dad and love even when the pictures are about something else entirely. The words must match what the child wants to say. Finding a word is a support, not a substitute for composing.
Some children want everything spelled correctly and become distressed by approximation. Matt speaks from experience: one of his twin daughters, Natalie, was like this. The aim is not to undo the child’s personality; that conscientiousness can be a strength. The aim is not to feed the perfectionism either.
What helped Natalie was arriving at her own formulation: “All right, I’ll write it in my best four-year-old way.” Once a child can say that, the adult can help them get a little better — without making today’s writing feel like a failure.
The goal is a child who puts pictures and words into their books on their own, at home and at school, whether or not an adult is beside them. Every strategy above is chosen because the child can use it independently.
| Child says | Instead of writing it, try |
|---|---|
| “Will you write this for me?” | “Write it the best you can. I’ll show you some ways.” |
| “I don’t know how to spell it.” | “Say it slowly and write the sounds you hear.” |
| “I can’t do letters yet.” | “You can scribble the word, or write letters you know.” |
| “It’s not right.” | “It doesn’t have to be perfect. What would a five-year-old write today?” |
| “I don’t know what to write.” | “Pretend to write it first, then tell me what it says.” |
| “How do you spell …?” | “Can you find that word somewhere in the room?” |
Part 1
youtube.com/watch?v=xtp58ffDyP8
“Part 1: Supporting Word Making for Young Writers” · 14 April 2020
Part 2
youtube.com/watch?v=jOK0cuBHrO8
“Part 2: Supporting Word Making For Young Children” · 15 April 2020
Channel: Parent to Parent
Further resources: authortoauthor.org → Parent Resources
寫給學前及幼稚園家長與教師的完整指南
幼兒拿着紙筆走過來問:「你可以替我寫這句嗎?」大多數成人會直接代寫。語文教育專家 Matt Glover 卻指出,他一般不會替孩子寫,並解釋背後的原因、可以怎樣回應,以及如何順應幼兒書寫發展的自然階段——他稱之為造詞(word making)。
講座分兩集。第一集說明造詞發展的各個階段,以及替孩子代寫的五個問題;第二集給出實際做法:該說甚麼、該示範甚麼,以及如何讓孩子每次只向前一小步。
本頁是兩集影片的詳細逐節整理,附上時間標記,可跳往原片對照。本頁並非逐字稿。
影片: Part 1: Supporting Word Making for Young Writers
約 10 分鐘 · Parent to Parent · 2020 年 4 月 14 日
學前及幼稚園的孩子常把一頁紙遞給成人,問:「你可以替我寫這句嗎?」家長與教師通常會照做。Matt Glover 的做法不同:在校園工作時,他不會替孩子寫。第一集解釋原因,第二集說明替代方法。
常見的假設是:孩子未掌握字母與語音的對應關係之前,甚麼也做不到。這個假設正是問題的根源。書寫發展並非由字母與語音開始,也不是由拼字開始。
在正式書寫之前,幼兒會經歷一連串近似嘗試。每一個階段都是真正的書寫,而不是「寫不好」。Matt 用孩子的作品逐一說明。
由初階語音拼寫開始,孩子會經歷開頭與結尾輔音、中間輔音與短元音、長元音規則,最後才走向慣用拼寫。重點是方向:正確拼字在很遠的前方,並不是起跑線;造詞也不是由拼字開始。
一旦明白孩子有替代做法,就要作決定:讓孩子盡力自己寫,還是由成人代寫。
Matt 展示 Allie 的一頁書:“Arthur’s friends go camping” 是成人在另一張紙上寫好,再由 Allie 抄過去的。抄寫看似獨立,其實不然。Allie 並沒有思考自己需要哪些字母,只是重現別人的決定。就思考而言,抄寫與成人代寫沒有分別。
成人寫下的字,通常不在孩子的閱讀詞彙之內;即使是 go 這種常見字,孩子也未必認得。Allie 讀自己的書時,根本沒有看文字,而是看圖畫回憶每頁要說的話。成人的字對她的閱讀沒有幫助。
要決定下一步教甚麼,必須先看見孩子完全獨立時能做甚麼。若成人代寫了整句,我們便不知道孩子原本會用塗鴉、隨機字母,還是每個詞寫一個音。沒有這個基準,就找不到「下一小步」。
學習發生在孩子現有獨立能力之外一點點的位置。代寫奪走了判斷這個位置所需的證據。
如果 Allie 原本會用隨機字母串寫這句,那麼直接把 friends 的正確拼法交給她,就是一次跨過十幾個階段。那不是輕輕推一步,而是用力推過中間所有發展。
沒有人是故意傷害孩子,但代寫傳出的訊息是:我不接受你的近似寫法;你這樣寫不夠好。孩子盡力寫成的,已經是當下最好的作品。成人應該安然接受,同時繼續教、繼續幫孩子進步。
目標不是要孩子一開始就完美,而是讓孩子把圖畫和文字都放進自己的書裡。若孩子從不寫字,就不會發現自己原來做得到。
如果孩子說「你可以替我畫一隻狗嗎?」,替她畫了,對她畫其他東西毫無幫助。我們會教策略:想想需要哪些形狀、哪些部分——尾巴、腿——用甚麼顏色。寫字也是如此。若我們不替孩子畫畫,為何要替孩子寫字?
有些情況代寫是合理的,例如孩子寫信給某人,想要那個人的名字,在家裡尤其常見,這稍有不同。但大體而言,基於上述理由,Matt 不會替孩子寫。
代寫無助孩子閱讀,無法顯示孩子能做甚麼,掩蓋了下一小步,跳過發展階段,也傳達了我們不想傳達的訊息。正確做法是教孩子可以獨立使用的策略。
影片: Part 2: Supporting Word Making for Young Children
約 8–9 分鐘 · Parent to Parent · 2020 年 4 月 15 日
這句話同時處理兩個層面:心態——不必每個字都拼對;能力——有具體方法可以把字寫到紙上。兩者缺一不可;只有安慰而沒有方法,孩子仍然會卡住。
當 Matt 問幼兒「你覺得自己應該每個字都拼得對嗎?」,最常見的答案是應該。成人必須傳達相反的訊息:在這個年紀,「盡力寫出來」就是正確的做法。四歲的孩子還能怎樣?但單是接受近似並不足夠,孩子還要知如何近似。
在學前及幼稚園課室,Matt 會教孩子把字寫進書裡的各種方法。他不假裝自己不會寫,而是誠實地說明示範的用意:「讓我示範四歲的孩子會怎樣做。讓我示範學前孩子會怎樣做。」示範要明確、簡短,並在學年初、孩子獨立造書之前反覆進行。
Matt 用自己的書示範:狗兒 Milo 追松鼠,松鼠在樹上,所以要寫的字是 tree。他沒有直接拼對,而是逐個說明幼兒可用的方法。
在字的位置畫連續線條。「你可以用線條代表你的字——可以的。這比完全沒有字好得多。」
寫孩子認識的字母、名字裡的字母,或從字母表挑選。X 和 O,或 Z 和 M,都可以。這真的拼出 tree 嗎?不——但四歲這樣寫是可以的。隨機字母仍有價值,因為孩子在練習寫字母。
把字拉長:t-r-ee。孩子可能聽到開頭的 t,或結尾的 e 音。寫一個音或幾個音都可以。Matt 之後會指出孩子尚未捕捉到的部分:tree 還有一個不易聽見的 r,以及一個幾乎無聲的 e。
假裝不是安慰獎,而是幼兒進入幾乎所有事情的方式。他們假裝做消防員、假裝做公主。假裝寫字是合理的起點;很多孩子聽到「可以假裝」就放鬆了。
Matt 用 leash(狗帶)重複示範:可以用塗鴉,可以寫 A、M、T 等隨機字母,也可以慢慢說、寫下開頭的 l。重複很重要,孩子要看見這些策略適用於所有字,而不是只對某一個字有效的把戲。
每次示範後,Matt 都會指出差距——「這真的拼出 tree 嗎?不」——然後立刻讓這個差距變得可以接受:「你四歲,這樣可以嗎?」孩子同時學到兩件事:拼字的真相,以及發展的真相。
接着是輕推。孩子可能在某個階段停留一陣子,這是正常的。成人的工作是持續觀察孩子現在能做甚麼,提供下一小步,而不是直接跳到終點。
要留意只寫「找得到的字」的孩子。Matt 見過孩子的書裡滿是 mum、dad、love,但圖畫說的完全是另一回事。文字必須配合孩子想說的話。找字是支援,不是構思的替代品。
有些孩子要求每個字都拼對,寫得不準確就十分難受。Matt 以自身經驗說明:他的雙胞胎女兒之一 Natalie 就是這樣。目標不是抹掉孩子的性格;這份認真可以是優點。但目標也不是助長完美主義。
Natalie 最終自己說出:「好吧,我就用四歲孩子最好的方式來寫。」當孩子能這樣說,成人就可以幫她再好一點——而不必讓今天的作品變成失敗。
目標是孩子無論在家在校、有沒有成人在旁,都能自己把圖畫和文字放進書裡。上述每一個策略,都是因為孩子可以獨立使用才值得教。
| 孩子說 | 不要代寫,改為說 |
|---|---|
| 「你可以替我寫這句嗎?」 | 「你盡力寫出來,我示範幾個方法給你看。」 |
| 「我不會拼。」 | 「慢慢說,把聽到的音寫下來。」 |
| 「我還不會寫字母。」 | 「可以用線條代表這個字,或寫你認識的字母。」 |
| 「這樣不對。」 | 「不必完美。五歲的孩子今天會怎樣寫?」 |
| 「我不知道寫甚麼。」 | 「先假裝寫,再告訴我它說甚麼。」 |
| 「這個字怎樣拼?」 | 「你能在課室裡找到這個字嗎?」 |
第一集
youtube.com/watch?v=xtp58ffDyP8
“Part 1: Supporting Word Making for Young Writers” · 2020 年 4 月 14 日
第二集
youtube.com/watch?v=jOK0cuBHrO8
“Part 2: Supporting Word Making For Young Children” · 2020 年 4 月 15 日
頻道:Parent to Parent
延伸資源:authortoauthor.org → Parent Resources